Skip to main content

Can We Be Done With This Anti-Obamacare Scare?


10.18.2010
License
Attribution Some rights reserved by Lori L. Stalteri

It's everywhere now. John Barrasso smelled something in the kitchen and thinks it's Democrats cooking the books.

Let's go ahead and make this a pot luck shall we? I'm bringing a dish called John Barrasso is a fucking idiot. Rather than mince the words, I threw them in whole.

Like everyone else, I just started signing up for healthcare at the last minute.

These guys just won't stop. Every opportunity, they try to muck up the works! I'm referring to these rethuglicans who just don't want to do anything but tell us that hell is round the corner.

Sebelius has been in Texas as I'm sure we all know, as there's nothing wrong with the administration beating the bushes to get people to sign up for this thing. Impending doom? A great disaster? It's exhausting and a great waste of time to get caught up in the spin cycle of opposition.

To the other end we have the privatization of healthcare, which is another scare tactic. Look, there is nothing but straight up reform and overhaul of everything that's been built over the past several decades and I don't know of any industry that doesn't already have access to the national treasury in one form or another who's gonna let that happen and it would take years and more decades to take it down.

Remember juggernaut in X-men? Once he gets going, you can't stop him. Best to just get out of the way.

But these nut-jobs want to try and play themselves as the little people. Grassroots. Texas tea. But they're not.

We in the middle, are doing what we can and are sick of this crap. I'm not alone on this, am I?

I just called the marketplace phone number and got the recording to call back later. No big deal, everybody just chill out!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Syrian air base attack triggered blame on Obama for chemical weapons in Syria

Embed from Getty Images ( BlastingNews ) - Since the Syrian air base attack, the discussion over chemical weapons in Syria continues to develop with the new comparison between diplomacy and military action. In that comparison, the Obama administration is still taking some heat from conservatives about how they are at fault for doing nothing. In this article about a discussion that took place on Charlie Rose between conservative columnist Bret Stephens and former White House official Tony Blinken, the blame over Syria's chemical weapons is about what was declared and what wasn't. To add, Stephens continues to tow the Republican line about the former president's "red line" statement and how they feel it made America look weak. [ Please support this writer by sharing out the source article and/or this service by donating what you can via PayPal ]
Post a Comment
Read more

Devin Nunes Gains GOP Support To Attack Mueller's Investigators

Embed from Getty Images Since being cleared by the House Ethics Committee in early December, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) has reportedly amp'd up his efforts to investigate those who are investigating President Trump over possible collusion with Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election. The committee initially began their investigation against Devin Nunes over allegations that he had revealed classified information to the public. This was determined when the California Republican arranged a spontaneous press conference in front of the White House one morning, after he had disappeared the night before to meet with then-unknown members of the President's National Security Council. It was later learned that those two unknown figures were Ezra Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis. Cohen-Watnick was one of the few White House staffers fired in August. It was during that press conference when Nunes claimed he acquired information that validated President Trump's cl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sen. Leahy, Emoluments Clause and 'Smug Judge' Neil Gorsuch

Embed from Getty Images ( Esquire ) - Since hearings for judge Neil Gorsuch started, the Senate Judiciary Committee -- as well as the rest of America -- has seen Gorsuch's personality on display. Esquire  details a series of questioning from Democrat Patrick Leahy that brought up President Trump's violation of the emoluments clause. Specifically, what he thought it meant. The article draws out quotes from Gorsuch where he sometimes seemed condescending in his answer or elusive in providing his opinion, knowing that at the very least, it was being "evaluated" over the current president. "Well, I am hesitant to discuss any part of the Constitution to the extent we're talking about a case that's likely to come before a court, pending or impending." The condescending part of his response is that no one knew what the Emolument Clause was until recently. Embed from Getty Images Giving Gorsuch a hard time in a hearing under the mo...
Post a Comment
Read more