Skip to main content

Details About This Blog Project

I want to point out a few things about this blog that will clarify what exactly we want to do. We're just another voice among Texans who want to comment on the goings on of this state, because we don't know what the pulse is like here, since it's all muddled up with rhetoric and politics.

Obviously there are other things going on that are of interest but we have the mid-terms this year and we're definitely in dire need of some change that keeps up with the changes going on in the mindset of a new generation. I don't know that we have enough coverage here that makes this as simple and cohesive as they should be. Every thing's divided up.

I'm interested in my state and the people in it and I want to contribute to the best of my ability, that's why I want to tell you about this plan I've got.

How I Fund This Blog

I spend a lot of time writing about all the things that interest me and I'm passionate about each and every one of them. The problem is that I have a lot of interests over many many subjects, and I spent all day and every day researching, reading and writing about all of these passions.

Just like the consensus in this state, I divide up my writing and put them into different blogs, which are funded by advertisers. I get a piece of that depending on the traffic I earn. This is so that I can fund little projects like this blog, which we're at the beginning of.

Being that this has largely been a conservative state, they'd be happy to know that this is a Texan who walks by the pulling of boot straps. So when you see links posted to other posts elsewhere, those posts fund Survival Journalism.

I'm pretty sure you agree that there's a lot of wacky shit going on for these mid-terms right now, stuff I want to talk about and good people that I want to focus on. In the next couple of months come hell or high water, I'm gonna start a podcast as a forum where we can all talk more about these things so we can see and show people what Texas is really like.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Syrian air base attack triggered blame on Obama for chemical weapons in Syria

Embed from Getty Images ( BlastingNews ) - Since the Syrian air base attack, the discussion over chemical weapons in Syria continues to develop with the new comparison between diplomacy and military action. In that comparison, the Obama administration is still taking some heat from conservatives about how they are at fault for doing nothing. In this article about a discussion that took place on Charlie Rose between conservative columnist Bret Stephens and former White House official Tony Blinken, the blame over Syria's chemical weapons is about what was declared and what wasn't. To add, Stephens continues to tow the Republican line about the former president's "red line" statement and how they feel it made America look weak. [ Please support this writer by sharing out the source article and/or this service by donating what you can via PayPal ]
Post a Comment
Read more

Devin Nunes Gains GOP Support To Attack Mueller's Investigators

Embed from Getty Images Since being cleared by the House Ethics Committee in early December, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) has reportedly amp'd up his efforts to investigate those who are investigating President Trump over possible collusion with Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election. The committee initially began their investigation against Devin Nunes over allegations that he had revealed classified information to the public. This was determined when the California Republican arranged a spontaneous press conference in front of the White House one morning, after he had disappeared the night before to meet with then-unknown members of the President's National Security Council. It was later learned that those two unknown figures were Ezra Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis. Cohen-Watnick was one of the few White House staffers fired in August. It was during that press conference when Nunes claimed he acquired information that validated President Trump's cl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sen. Leahy, Emoluments Clause and 'Smug Judge' Neil Gorsuch

Embed from Getty Images ( Esquire ) - Since hearings for judge Neil Gorsuch started, the Senate Judiciary Committee -- as well as the rest of America -- has seen Gorsuch's personality on display. Esquire  details a series of questioning from Democrat Patrick Leahy that brought up President Trump's violation of the emoluments clause. Specifically, what he thought it meant. The article draws out quotes from Gorsuch where he sometimes seemed condescending in his answer or elusive in providing his opinion, knowing that at the very least, it was being "evaluated" over the current president. "Well, I am hesitant to discuss any part of the Constitution to the extent we're talking about a case that's likely to come before a court, pending or impending." The condescending part of his response is that no one knew what the Emolument Clause was until recently. Embed from Getty Images Giving Gorsuch a hard time in a hearing under the mo...
Post a Comment
Read more