Skip to main content

Affordable Care Act Repeal Delay Hides GOP 'Martial Law' Effort to Pass

After seven years of Republicans trying to defeat the Affordable Care Act, their opportunity to immediately repeal the law was delayed by their own faction of right-wing extremists within their own body on Thursday.

According to The Washington Post -- one of many media outlets reporting from Capitol Hill -- delaying the repeal of the Affordable Care Act was a confrontation that Republicans made by themselves.
Those extremist right-wing elements in the party reportedly feel pressured by their constituents to cut a better deal. But it's not very clear to many Americans that with Republicans messing with the Affordable Care Act, that they're going to help "improve" it.

The Post's report on the "embarrassment" says that earlier in the week, House leaders were making some last minute adjustments to pass the bill, but they weren't adjustments that would improve the bill itself but rather to improve ways they could pass it.

This is further detailed in a report by Daily KOS:

Republicans are, literally, trying to impose what's called "martial law." They're trying to override the rule that legislation has to have at least one day between introduction and a vote on the floor, so that whenever they get the agreement between the Freedom Caucus and Trump inked legislative language it can go straight to the floor. That means that there will be no score from the Congressional Budget Office. There will be no hearings. There will be no mark-ups. And what they are talking about doing could have truly radical consequences.

In reference to The Post article, it said that moderate and hardline conservatives were marching back and forth between Capitol Hill and the White House on Thursday trying and cut some deal, but the same media source questioned "President" Trump's negotiating abilities with theit failure to pass their bill on time.

What also can't be ignored is the fact that Republicans have had a hard time getting their way over the past several years under the Obama administration, so this set back is no different.

However, they've also been persistant and have no shame or moral compass in their efforts, which guarantees that they will try to repeal and replace the ACA every which way they can until they do.

Here is a thorough report by PBS Newshour.

Popular posts from this blog

Whitefish Energy Is More Connected To Trump Than By Potential Conflicts of Interest

Embed from Getty Images Weeks after the island of Puerto Rico was devastated by Hurricane Maria, aid is still getting wrapped up in a political storm instigated by the Trump administration.
Most recently, it was reported that a company from northwest Montana called Whitefish Energy Holdings LLC had signed a contract worth $300 million with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) in order to restore power.

Since the storm, the US Army Corps of Engineers claimed that the storm affected 80 percent of Puerto Rico's electrical grid. It's been reported that the first group of employees from Whitefish Energy arrived on September 26.
So far as of last Thursday, 300 subcontractors and employees arrived. A spokesman for the company, Chris Chiames, said that they were looking to rebuild 100 miles of transmission lines. The company said they expect to have a total of 1,000 employees working to restore power. Whitefish Energy's tied to Trump administration According to a news …

Petition to Stop Neil Gorsuch Confirmation

A petition from is making its rounds to put a stop to President Trump's pick for Supreme Court justice, judge Neil Gorsuch. For every signature, three more are added. Here is the link.

Sen. Leahy, Emoluments Clause and 'Smug Judge' Neil Gorsuch

Embed from Getty Images
(Esquire) - Since hearings for judge Neil Gorsuch started, the Senate Judiciary Committee -- as well as the rest of America -- has seen Gorsuch's personality on display.

Esquire details a series of questioning from Democrat Patrick Leahy that brought up President Trump's violation of the emoluments clause. Specifically, what he thought it meant.
The article draws out quotes from Gorsuch where he sometimes seemed condescending in his answer or elusive in providing his opinion, knowing that at the very least, it was being "evaluated" over the current president.

"Well, I am hesitant to discuss any part of the Constitution to the extent we're talking about a case that's likely to come before a court, pending or impending."
The condescending part of his response is that no one knew what the Emolument Clause was until recently.

Embed from Getty Images Giving Gorsuch a hard time in a hearing under the most blatantly corrupt and contro…