Skip to main content

Despite Divisions Over Syria, Most Everyone Agrees Assad Has To Go

Bashar al Assad
Add caption
(BlastingNews) -In the United States, the transition between presidents threatened the view that Syrian president Bashar al-Assad had to be removed from power.

But that no longer seems to be the case as the U.S. and other Western powers continue to demand it, after his recent use of chemical weapons against his own people, the continuation of a civil war without end and instability in the Middle East.

In this report, I explain the different views put forward by analysts and experts who feel that Assad needs to go and even offer some insight into what comes next.

Popular posts from this blog

Whitefish Energy Is More Connected To Trump Than By Potential Conflicts of Interest

Embed from Getty Images Weeks after the island of Puerto Rico was devastated by Hurricane Maria, aid is still getting wrapped up in a political storm instigated by the Trump administration.
Most recently, it was reported that a company from northwest Montana called Whitefish Energy Holdings LLC had signed a contract worth $300 million with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) in order to restore power.

Since the storm, the US Army Corps of Engineers claimed that the storm affected 80 percent of Puerto Rico's electrical grid. It's been reported that the first group of employees from Whitefish Energy arrived on September 26.
So far as of last Thursday, 300 subcontractors and employees arrived. A spokesman for the company, Chris Chiames, said that they were looking to rebuild 100 miles of transmission lines. The company said they expect to have a total of 1,000 employees working to restore power. Whitefish Energy's tied to Trump administration According to a news …

Petition to Stop Neil Gorsuch Confirmation

A petition from MoveOn.org is making its rounds to put a stop to President Trump's pick for Supreme Court justice, judge Neil Gorsuch. For every signature, three more are added. Here is the link.

Sen. Leahy, Emoluments Clause and 'Smug Judge' Neil Gorsuch

Embed from Getty Images
(Esquire) - Since hearings for judge Neil Gorsuch started, the Senate Judiciary Committee -- as well as the rest of America -- has seen Gorsuch's personality on display.

Esquire details a series of questioning from Democrat Patrick Leahy that brought up President Trump's violation of the emoluments clause. Specifically, what he thought it meant.
The article draws out quotes from Gorsuch where he sometimes seemed condescending in his answer or elusive in providing his opinion, knowing that at the very least, it was being "evaluated" over the current president.

"Well, I am hesitant to discuss any part of the Constitution to the extent we're talking about a case that's likely to come before a court, pending or impending."
The condescending part of his response is that no one knew what the Emolument Clause was until recently.

Embed from Getty Images Giving Gorsuch a hard time in a hearing under the most blatantly corrupt and contro…